Zoning

Winston Solar PUD

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (6)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 3, 2026.

Public comments (16)

OpposedRobin BiggsSep 3, 2026

Opposed the amendment, citing missing NDOT encroachment permits, wildlife hazards to birds, and the broken 1,980-foot setback agreement.

Board of County Commissioners - Sep 3, 2026 · 4:50 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentSep 3, 2026

Criticized the county for repeatedly changing ordinance standards and asked to be told plainly if North Mason Valley is becoming an industrial valley.

Board of County Commissioners - Sep 3, 2026 · 40:37 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentSep 3, 2026

Said Chair Keller gave his word at prior hearings that 1,980 feet was final and urged the board not to go back on it.

Board of County Commissioners - Sep 3, 2026 · 44:49 →
OpposedJames VertashiSep 3, 2026

Called the claim that power lines are less obtrusive than solar panels ridiculous and asked for easier public access to hearing documents.

Board of County Commissioners - Sep 3, 2026 · 46:02 →
OpposedTim FaustJan 5, 2026

Skeptical of promised school tax revenue, questioned whether construction wages and workers would benefit Yerington, and raised traffic and environmental concerns on Highway 95.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:07:27 →
OpposedPhyllis HiskettJan 5, 2026

Challenged the letters of support as coming from project-connected people, opposed battery storage fire risk, insisted on the half-mile setback to avoid precedent, and asked that the item be tabled.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:10:54 →
OpposedJudith HarkerJan 5, 2026

Supported the staff recommendation to deny for now, opposed undermining setbacks, and asked for a realistic depreciation-based tax estimate and 95A improvement planning.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:14:07 →
SupportiveMelanie YoungJan 5, 2026

Representing the Yerington Main Street Committee and Chamber of Commerce, submitted letters of support.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:16:51 →
SupportiveScott LommoriJan 5, 2026

Supported the project but asked the board to explain the difference between a CUP and a PUD.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:17:16 →
NeutralFrank DelPortoJan 5, 2026

Questioned whether impact studies were done for past projects like the Parkway road and the substation.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:19:50 →
OpposedJim DeChambeauJan 5, 2026

Argued the project should be a special use permit and rezone rather than a PUD, opposed solar on agricultural land, and cited the incomplete traffic study.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:21:50 →
OpposedLeo ScolariJan 5, 2026

Not against solar generally, but said moving the project closer to the highway would block future widening and endanger travelers on 95.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:25:20 →
NeutralKayla AlmJan 5, 2026

Comstock Metals' permitting director offered the company's services to develop a panel recycling and decommissioning plan under AB 493.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:26:33 →
SupportiveNick BeatonJan 5, 2026

The Yerington city councilman voiced support, citing economic development benefits for Mason Valley.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:27:22 →
OpposedLeslie SomreJan 5, 2026

Said the project should follow every aspect of the amended code and may be better suited elsewhere; urged the board to support the planner's findings and deny.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:28:03 →
SupportiveKJ JoshiJan 5, 2026

A Mason Valley landowner who spoke in support of the project.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 5, 2026 · 2:29:21 →